Últimos assuntos
Tópicos mais visitados
Tópicos mais ativos
O uso positivo da teologia de Darwin no Origem das Espécies
Página 1 de 1
05072012
O uso positivo da teologia de Darwin no Origem das Espécies
http://pos-darwinista.blogspot.com.br/2012/07/tarefa-para-casa-de-antonio-carlos.html
The British Journal for the History of Science
March 2012 45 : pp 29-56
Copyright © British Society for the History of Science 2011
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S000708741100032X
Charles Darwin's use of theology in the Origin of Species
STEPHEN DILLEY a1
a1 Department of Philosophy, St Edward's University, Austin, TX 78704, USA.
Email: stephend@stedwards.edu.
Abstract
This essay examines Darwin's positiva (or positive) use of theology in the first edition of the Origin of Species in three steps. First, the essay analyses the Origin's theological language about God's accessibility, honesty, methods of creating, relationship to natural laws and lack of responsibility for natural suffering; the essay contends that Darwin utilized positiva theology in order to help justify (and inform) descent with modification and to attack special creation. Second, the essay offers critical analysis of this theology, drawing in part on Darwin's mature ruminations to suggest that, from an epistemic point of view, the Origin's positiva theology manifests several internal tensions. Finally, the essay reflects on the relative epistemic importance of positiva theology in the Origin's overall case for evolution. The essay concludes that this theology served as a handmaiden and accomplice to Darwin's science.
(Online publication May 04 2011)
Subscription or payment needed/Requer pagamento ou assinatura.
+++++
Excerpt/Excerto:
I have argued that, in the first edition of the Origin, Darwin drew upon at least the following positiva theological claims in his case for descent with modification (and against special creation):
1. Human begins are not justfied in believing that God creates in ways analogous to the intellectual powers of the human mind.
2. A God who is free to create as He wishes would create new biological limbs de novo rather than from a common pattern.
3. A respectable deity would create biological structures in accord with a human conception of the 'simplest mode' to accomplish the functions of these structures.
4. God would only create the minimum structure required for a given part's function.
5. God does not provide false empirical information about the origins of organisms.
6. God impressed the laws of nature on matter.
7. God directly created the first 'primordial' life.
8. God did not perform miracles within organic history subsequent to the creation of the first life.
9. A 'distant' God is not morally culpable for natural pain and suffering.
10. The God of special creation, who allegedly performed miracles in organic history, is not plausible given the presence of natural pain and suffering.
The British Journal for the History of Science
March 2012 45 : pp 29-56
Copyright © British Society for the History of Science 2011
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S000708741100032X
Charles Darwin's use of theology in the Origin of Species
STEPHEN DILLEY a1
a1 Department of Philosophy, St Edward's University, Austin, TX 78704, USA.
Email: stephend@stedwards.edu.
Abstract
This essay examines Darwin's positiva (or positive) use of theology in the first edition of the Origin of Species in three steps. First, the essay analyses the Origin's theological language about God's accessibility, honesty, methods of creating, relationship to natural laws and lack of responsibility for natural suffering; the essay contends that Darwin utilized positiva theology in order to help justify (and inform) descent with modification and to attack special creation. Second, the essay offers critical analysis of this theology, drawing in part on Darwin's mature ruminations to suggest that, from an epistemic point of view, the Origin's positiva theology manifests several internal tensions. Finally, the essay reflects on the relative epistemic importance of positiva theology in the Origin's overall case for evolution. The essay concludes that this theology served as a handmaiden and accomplice to Darwin's science.
(Online publication May 04 2011)
Subscription or payment needed/Requer pagamento ou assinatura.
+++++
Excerpt/Excerto:
I have argued that, in the first edition of the Origin, Darwin drew upon at least the following positiva theological claims in his case for descent with modification (and against special creation):
1. Human begins are not justfied in believing that God creates in ways analogous to the intellectual powers of the human mind.
2. A God who is free to create as He wishes would create new biological limbs de novo rather than from a common pattern.
3. A respectable deity would create biological structures in accord with a human conception of the 'simplest mode' to accomplish the functions of these structures.
4. God would only create the minimum structure required for a given part's function.
5. God does not provide false empirical information about the origins of organisms.
6. God impressed the laws of nature on matter.
7. God directly created the first 'primordial' life.
8. God did not perform miracles within organic history subsequent to the creation of the first life.
9. A 'distant' God is not morally culpable for natural pain and suffering.
10. The God of special creation, who allegedly performed miracles in organic history, is not plausible given the presence of natural pain and suffering.
Eduardo- Mensagens : 5997
Idade : 54
Inscrição : 08/05/2010
Tópicos semelhantes
» Teoria da Origem Superior das Espécies
» Em 1859 Darwin não explicou a origem das espécies. Em 2011 ainda não sabemos a origem das espécies???
» Darwin 'falou e disse': somos ignorantes sobre a origem das espécies
» Alunos de Biologia desconhecem a argumentação teológica inadequada de Darwin no Origem das Espécies
» Darwin (1859) não explicou a origem das espécies, e até agora nenhum de seus discípulos...
» Em 1859 Darwin não explicou a origem das espécies. Em 2011 ainda não sabemos a origem das espécies???
» Darwin 'falou e disse': somos ignorantes sobre a origem das espécies
» Alunos de Biologia desconhecem a argumentação teológica inadequada de Darwin no Origem das Espécies
» Darwin (1859) não explicou a origem das espécies, e até agora nenhum de seus discípulos...
Permissões neste sub-fórum
Não podes responder a tópicos
Dom Fev 19, 2017 7:48 pm por Augusto
» Acordem adventistas...
Ter Fev 07, 2017 8:37 pm por Augusto
» O que Vestir Para Ir à Igreja?
Qui Dez 01, 2016 7:46 pm por Augusto
» Ir para o céu?
Qui Nov 17, 2016 7:40 pm por Augusto
» Chat do Forum
Sáb Ago 27, 2016 10:51 pm por Edgardst
» TV Novo Tempo...
Qua Ago 24, 2016 8:40 pm por Augusto
» Lutas de MMA são usadas como estratégia por Igreja Evangélica para atrair mais fiéis
Dom Ago 21, 2016 10:12 am por Augusto
» Lew Wallace, autor do célebre livro «Ben-Hur», converteu-se quando o escrevia
Seg Ago 15, 2016 7:00 pm por Eduardo
» Ex-pastor evangélico é batizado no Pará
Qua Jul 27, 2016 10:00 am por Eduardo
» Citações de Ellen White sobre a Vida em Outros Planetas Não Caídos em Pecado
Ter Jul 26, 2016 9:29 pm por Eduardo
» Viagem ao Sobrenatural - Roger Morneau
Dom Jul 24, 2016 6:52 pm por Eduardo
» As aparições de Jesus após sua morte não poderiam ter sido alucinações?
Sáb Jul 23, 2016 4:04 pm por Eduardo